The Resurrection – Legend, Myth, Reality?

Why is it so important to deal with the question of “legend” as it pertains to the resurrection?

Legends allow people to pick and choose what was real and what was not in the absence of evidence to the contrary (or in the face of evidence against their legend).  When it comes to the resurrection of Jesus it is critical to address the legend or myth theories.

Three types of legends exists: embellishments, nonhistorical literary style, and myths from religions.

It is important to note that the texts that we have for the New Testament are rarely questioned from a scholarly accurate standpoint.  Meaning, they are very close to the original texts and any differences between them do not affect doctrine.  So the question becomes, did legend enter Christian tradition prior to the writing of the different books? I will address this from the viewpoint of each type of legend.

1. Regarding embellishment: the resurrection story can be traced to the eye-witness experiences of the original apostles.  So if embellishments entered over time then it would not match what the disciples have said.  The apostle Paul’s conversion based on an encounter with the resurrected Jesus would need to be explained away, as does the conversion of James, Jesus’ brother.  Lastly, just by suggesting embellishments occurred does not make it true.  Each individual account would need to be studied and scrutinized to determine what was embellished.  Simply stating that the resurrection was an embellishment is not a valid argument.

2. When it comes to nonhistorical genre (basically stories that people make-up for various reasons) there are several issues.  First, we still have the empty tomb as an established historical fact (see this post).  To go with this accusation other theories have to be used and these will be addressed in later posts.  Second, the conversion of Paul would not have come about from a fable or story.  Paul was a well educated man, a man of high renown and impeccable service to his God.  To say that he changed his beliefs and incurred the scorn of his people for a lie would make him crazy at best.  James falls into this category as well.  Why would the brother of Jesus knowingly follow a story about his dead brother?  What did Paul or James have to gain from preaching the gospel of the Christians that was powerful enough to make them give up their Jewish faith?  Fourth, if educated people used non-historical literature (other works of fiction) and were aware of it then they also knew about HISTORICAL works – meaning factual works.  Just because the works existed at the same time does not mean those works were used.  Those citing any nonhistorical works that have resurrection accounts in them need to show evidence for how they know it was used to create the resurrection belief.  Lastly, early second century critics, although well after the resurrection was in place, felt a need to address the resurrection from a historical perspective and not as legend.  They argued from the viewpoint that Jesus did exist and that the tomb was indeed found empty.

The last type of legend suggests that because other legends have figures who were resurrected that Jesus’ resurrection is not any different and should be seen as folklore of sorts.  First off, the only account before Christ that had a god rising from the grave is out of Egyptian culture regarding the cult of Osiris.  Study it yourself, the differences are huge.  Even the life after death piece differs drastically.  Where Jesus is seen physically, in good health, eating, fellowshipping with others, walking, talking, etc… it is questionable whether Osiris was brought back from the dead or even seen by anyone after his death.  Osiris’ story has differing accounts (major differences) and the resurrection is more like a haunting or ghost than what Jesus did.  Secondly, opposing theories can easily account for other stories while the resurrection of Jesus’ has no opposing theories that have evidence to support them (again this will be addressed in future posts).  Third, simply because other religions have resurrection stories does not dispel the facts behind the resurrection of Jesus.

So what we have is enough evidence to dispel legend as the culprit behind the resurrection.  The biggest ones in my opinion are: first hand accounts of what happened – namely Matthew and John’s testimony coupled with secondhand testimony from Mark and Luke (a physician – a well respected profession even in the 1st Century), Paul’s conversion and life history, Jesus’ brother James’ conversion and subsequent ministry, and early critics addressing the empty tomb and life of Jesus as though they happened instead of as legend or myth.

This is already long enough and there were four more questions that were supposed to go with this post.  Like I put in the original – I will break this one down into several posts.

Daddy Moose

Tagged , , , , , , ,

2 thoughts on “The Resurrection – Legend, Myth, Reality?

  1. Ma K says:

    Finally got a chance to read this post, even though you wrote it several weeks ago. I know you are looking for other evidence to prove the resurrection to be true, and I respect that. I just want to say that those of us who believe the Bible is written by men inspired by God—God breathed–don’t believe embellishment could happen. But for those that wonder about it, I do agree they would need evidence to prove that.

    I never thought about Paul and James having absolutely nothing to gain from becoming Christians, and preaching the Gospel, unless it was the truth.
    They obviously had an experience that couldn’t be denied, and they were changed forever. I don’t think they gave up what they believed, though. I think they got the full revelation of the Old Testament prophecies being fulfilled, and they became “completed Jews”, or “messianic Jews”, or “Christian Jews” with that revelation. Everything we believe as Christians goes back to our Judeo Christian roots.

    I hope others are reading your posts, even if they aren’t commenting. I want to hear the rest of the story, as Paul Harvey would say.

    Love and Hugs,
    Ma K

    • Daddy Moose says:

      I don’t know if I am going to continue the series. The past two or three weekends I have been strapped for time. When I went back last weekend to do the post I found myself going, “this stuff is so dry”. It has a purpose but I don’t know if this is what I need to focus on right now. Not sure what to do with the rest of them. I might do it all in one week over Christmas Break and just be done with it. That would probably be the best option. Then I could free myself up for anything else that might come my way. I also have the last part of my Graduate work to do. It is a comprehensive exit exam, covering three out of about 8 topics to choose from with specific questions for each. I know which ones I am doing, now I need to get it finished so I can be rid of this coursework!

      I agree with you that Paul and James came into a full knowledge or revelation of God once they became believers, however, they did give up a way of life that they were used to built around legal customs, rituals, etc… that had them working their way to heaven. This new way of thinking made them outcasts of their existing networks and alienated them from their own people group. I would equate it with you or I becoming a Muslim, Atheist, or Wiccan where we currently live. It just wouldn’t fly. What do you think?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Closet Atheist

At college, a Christian. At home, a Lutheran. At heart, an atheist.

Convert Corner

Exploring conversion to Judaism

Full Circle Homeschooling

reflections of a second-generation homeschooler

Jonathan Camac

Student of Life. Advocate for serious joy in Christ.

Amanda Jewel's Front Porch

Southern musings, contemplations, and inspirations from Amanda Jewel's front porch


Thoughts out of the blue

%d bloggers like this: